AI-voice review request for career documents

# AI-voice review request for career documents

AI Summary

Purpose:

• Preserve the user's request to add an I'm not AI-style review to the shared resume pipeline and to rewrite the crawler page that sounded generated.

Key points:

• The user identified the phrase and narrative around library crawler modernization as overly AI-like.
• The existing linter caught banned vocabulary but missed templated structure.
• The new review must detect abstract noun labels, long arrow narratives, abstract outcome-card clusters, quotation contrasts, and uniform sentence endings.
• Claude Code and Codex must both apply the same automated and manual checks.

Relevant when:

• Reviewing resumes, portfolio pages, or other career-facing Korean copy for generated-sounding structure.

Do not read full document unless:

• The origin of the stronger human-voice gate is needed.

Linked documents:

• scripts/check_human_voice.py
• skills/tailor-resume-to-job/references/human-voice-review.md
• human/portfolio/items/crawler-modernization.html

Open Questions

• None.

Details

User feedback, 2026-07-22:

i'm not ai 같은 플러그인을 사용해서 이게 지금 ai 형태 문장이 많은지 확인도 조금 필요해. 지금 라이브러리 현대화 같은 표현은 AI 티가 많이 난다.

Implementation boundary:

• No installed plugin named I'm not AI was available to Codex.
• The local jobstack humanize-check.md supplied the substitution and basic AI-signal checks.
• Repository checks were extended with structural signals and a manual colleague-read-aloud review instead of claiming external-detector safety.