# AWS Service Scope Correction
AI Summary
Purpose:
- Preserve the user's correction about the AWS services used in the LabradorLabs infrastructure and GS Retail application materials.
Key points:
- The verified AWS service scope is Amazon EC2 only.
- MySQL and the related application workloads were self-managed on EC2.
- Do not claim production use of Amazon RDS, Amazon S3, or Amazon EFS for this work.
- Describe the remaining production database as self-managed MySQL on AWS EC2, not as RDS.
Relevant when:
- Writing resumes, portfolio pages, reports, slides, or interview notes about the AWS-to-IDC migration.
- Mapping the user's experience to a job description that asks for AWS managed services.
Do not read full document unless:
- Exact correction provenance is required.
Linked documents:
../../wiki/people/hyunwook.md../../wiki/people/career-timeline.md../../worklog/2026/2026-W30.md../../../human/portfolio/items/aws-to-idc-migration.html
Open Questions
- None for the AWS service boundary.
Details
On 2026-07-22, the user corrected the GS Retail application material: the actual AWS service used was EC2 only. References to RDS, S3, and EFS were incorrect and must not be reused.
Normalization rule:
RDBoroperating DB on AWSmeans the MySQL workload self-managed on EC2 in this context.- It does not establish Amazon RDS usage.
- The verified migration result remains: the production DB EC2 instance stayed on AWS while other EC2 workloads were moved to IDC/In-house, reducing monthly AWS cost by about 94%.